16 Jun
2010
16 Jun
'10
4:49 p.m.
Hi Andreas,
Half an hour ago i thought of asking for a release
candidate and voila... ;-)
Unfortunately there is nothing in for us today :-(
I'm sure there will be plenty of new features in future versions that
will please you :)
May i ask what the timeframe (if any) is for the
following features
(sort by importance IMHO)
- DSN support according to RFC 1891
( Needed to get DSN request through when sending mail)
Isn't this the task of the MTA (i.e. of Postfix)? afaik Postfix supports
RFC 3461 which is the succession of RFC 1891. I probably misunderstand
your request so could you explain to me what you mean with "DSN support
according to RFC 1891"?
- Automatic public key fetch by LDAP
( Needed to make it easier to get public keys from services like
www.bridge-ca.org)
I might be working on this feature next because a client might have a
need for this feature. I do not have a clear timeframe but it shouldn't
take too long.
- User viewable tagging (subject extension) for
incoming signed/encrypted mail
( Sometimes it is really useful if the user is able to check)
If I understand you, you want to add some sort of banner to the message
containing the security information? something similar to what's added
to the headers but now visible for the end-user?
- Timestamp support when signing
( Not really useful today but more in a long term if clients or
mailarchives are able to check )
I haven't had time to think about this. From our previous discussion the
biggest problem with this is client-side support for checking the
timestamp'd signature. The request has been placed in the development
agenda but with a low priority.
Kind regards,
Martijn Brinkers
--
Djigzo open source email encryption